[Sezer_Duygulu_README_EN.md](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/26302800/Sezer_Duygulu_README_EN.md)
# Sezer Duygulu – public context, connections, and documented contradictions

## Important legal and methodological disclaimer

This material is solely documentary, informational, and analytical in nature. It has been prepared on the basis of publicly available sources and documented materials related to an individual employment case. The purpose of this study is not to attribute criminal, civil, or administrative liability to anyone without a final and binding ruling, but to present the public context, organizational links, and documented inconsistencies that may be relevant to assessing credibility, transparency of conduct, and risk on the part of entities operating in this area.

The use in this material of the full name Sezer Duygulu occurs only to the extent necessary to identify the person in the context of publicly available materials, business links, and circumstances relevant to the case. The processing and publication of these data are intended to serve the legitimate interest of documenting a matter of public significance and exercising freedom of expression and information, while respecting the principles of proportionality, diligence, and caution.

Despite care taken in collecting and organizing the material, it cannot be ruled out that within such an extensive body of information there may have been unintentional mistakes, inaccuracies, interpretative errors, simplifications, or gaps resulting from limited availability of certain data, changes over time, or the incompleteness of public sources. For that reason, any person who would like to base their own actions, assessment, publication, or decision on this material should first independently verify the indicated information in primary sources, registers, judgments, official documents, and source materials.

If any fragment requires clarification, correction, or updating, it should be treated as a matter requiring further verification and not as a final determination of the facts. This applies in particular to places where the material is based on a combination of multiple public sources, indirect accounts, or incomplete documents. This material does not constitute legal advice, an accusation, or a definitive finding of liability. It has a precautionary and documentary character.

It should also be emphasized that part of the material remains under review and editorial organization. In such cases, this has been clearly indicated. Such a part should not be treated as a final version or as an independent basis for drawing categorical conclusions without prior verification of the sources.

## Purpose of this section

This section has been prepared as a supplement to the main evidence report. Its purpose is to combine:
- publicly available information concerning Sezer Duygulu and entities linked to him,
- public red flags concerning the activities of companies within this ecosystem,
- recent, documented materials indicating inconsistencies in an individual case related to Intrixo.

## Public context

In publicly available materials, Sezer Duygulu is presented as a person connected with the Home of People group and with brands and entities operating in the temporary work sector and the employment of migrant workers, including, among others, names such as Uitzendbureau Solutions, Intrixo (Voorneputten), Efficient at Work, T&S Flexwerk, NWH Jobs, and Masterteam.

The mere fact of a public connection with such an extensive ecosystem does not in itself determine responsibility for specific violations. However, it is contextually significant, especially where warning signals have appeared for years around some of these entities concerning labour rights, housing conditions, worker dependence on the agency, deductions, and transparency of conduct toward migrant workers.

## Public red flags

Important warning signals concerning companies in this ecosystem have appeared in the public domain. They included, among other things:
- labour law disputes,
- problems concerning the protection of agency workers,
- controversies regarding the living and working conditions of migrant workers,
- the need for increased supervision over housing and working conditions.

The description of these signals matters not because it automatically determines the guilt of a particular person, but because it forms an important background for assessing credibility and risk in individual labour disputes.

## Recent evidence and documented contradictions

In my individual case related to Intrixo (Voorneputten), I collected recent materials indicating significant contradictions between:
- the content of correspondence,
- arrangements concerning leave,
- records in scheduling,
- payroll settlement,
- and the version later presented to SNCU.

The documentation shows that the period which was later presented in a way intended to undermine the leave arrangements was, at the same time, recorded in the scheduling system and in payroll documents as leave or as a period settled using leave days. This creates a clear documentary inconsistency.

## Why this matters

Taken separately, public red flags may be treated as context, and an individual dispute as a single case. However, when viewed together, they show something far more serious: a possible problem with the credibility of the explanations presented, the consistency of the documentation, and the transparency of conduct toward the worker.

That is precisely why this material has been separated as a distinct section of the report. It is not about emotional accusations, but about showing that there are publicly visible warning signs and concrete, recent documentary evidence that cannot honestly be ignored.

## Conclusion

At this stage, the publicly available information and the evidence I have collected do not in themselves constitute a final ruling on the personal guilt of Sezer Duygulu. However, they provide sufficient grounds to treat the activities of entities connected with this ecosystem as requiring increased attention, caution, and further scrutiny with regard to:
- labour rights,
- transparency of documentation,
- housing conditions,
- the worker’s economic dependence on the agency,
- and the credibility of explanations submitted to institutions.

## Connection with the main report

This section supplements the main public report and should be read together with the remaining parts of the documentation, including the timeline, the description of allegations, the evidence material, and the anonymization rules.

## Entities and locations connected with this ecosystem

Available public information indicates that the ecosystem of entities publicly linked to Sezer Duygulu and the Home of People structure includes or has included, among others, the following entities operating in the Netherlands:
- Solutions / Uitzendbureau Solutions,
- T&S Flexwerk,
- NWH Jobs,
- Efficient at Work,
- Intrixo (Voorneputten),
- Masterteam.

In the context of recruiting workers to the Netherlands, entities operating in Poland are also relevant, which are or may be organizationally, operationally, commercially, or recruitment-wise linked to the ecosystem indicated above. Such entities include in particular:
- VP Flex sp. z o.o. – Elbląg,
- Efficient People Agency Polska sp. z o.o. – Końskie,
- NWH Jobs Poland – Kalisz,
- Efficient at Work – a structure or operational branch indicated in Końskie.

On the Dutch side, the following are indicated among the significant operational locations:
- Uitzendbureau Solutions – De Lier (head office) and Heerhugowaard,
- T&S Flexwerk – Waalwijk,
- NWH Jobs – Noordwijkerhout,
- Efficient at Work – De Lier,
- Intrixo (Voorneputten) – Maasland.

At this stage, it cannot be ruled out that the list of these entities is broader and also includes other companies, brands, branches, or recruitment entities operating in Poland or the Netherlands. Some of these links require further verification on the basis of registry documents, corporate data, recruitment materials, websites, and job offers.

## Significance for the main report

The significance of this section does not lie in automatically attributing responsibility to a specific person for every action of every entity within this ecosystem. It has a contextual and documentary character. It shows that the individual case concerning Intrixo (Voorneputten) does not exist in a vacuum, but fits into a broader system of entities, recruitment brands, and operational structures related to the employment of migrant workers and their placement into work and housing in the Netherlands.

## The most important labour disputes

### 1) Uitzendbureau Solutions — the most important set of disputes

This is not a single incident, but one major labour dispute extending across several publicly published judgments. Official sources show the following sequence:

#### a) Rechtbank Den Haag — 22 August 2017  
**ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2017:10292**

This was the starting point of the entire dispute. Later summaries and the relationships between the rulings show that the cantonal court then dismissed the worker’s claim, holding that the agency contract had ended as a result of a sickness report under Article 13(3) of the NBBU collective labour agreement. In later official materials from the Hoge Raad and in academic commentary from the University of Amsterdam, this stage was explicitly identified as the first instance of that dispute.

#### b) Gerechtshof Den Haag — 17 March 2020  
**ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2020:460**

This was the key turning point in the case. The official Rechtspraak communication summarized it as follows: from 1 July 2015, an agency clause in the event of sickness or incapacity for work is contrary to the law. The entry for the judgment itself states that the case concerned the “uitzendbeding in artikel 13 NBBU-CAO bij ziekte of arbeidsongeschiktheid.” This means that the appellate court rejected the model in which sickness alone automatically ends agency employment.

#### c) Gerechtshof Den Haag — 20 July 2021  
**ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2021:1511**

This was a subsequent stage after the main legal issue had been resolved. The official case summary expressly states that it concerned the “berekening achterstallig loon, vakantiegeld en feestdagenreservering.” In other words, after the dispute over whether the contract had been lawfully terminated at all, the court moved on to calculating outstanding wages and allowances.

#### d) Hoge Raad — 17 March 2023  
**ECLI:NL:HR:2023:426**

This was the final and strongest judgment in the entire series. The Hoge Raad held that a fictitious request from the hirer included in the collective labour agreement was invalid. For an agency contract to end on the basis of an agency clause, an actual request from the client or user of labour is required, not an automatic fiction linked to sickness. The materials relating to this case also show the factual background: the worker was employed by Uitzendbureau Solutions, suffered a workplace accident, then became ill or reported incapacity for work, after which a dispute arose concerning further wage payment.

### What this practically means for Uitzendbureau Solutions

This is not a minor incident, but a full, public chain of labour disputes: first over the legality of ending employment in the event of sickness or an accident, and then over the calculation of outstanding wages and allowances.

### 2) Intrixo B.V. — direct employment case

#### Rechtbank Den Haag — 28 April 2025  
**ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2025:14934**

This is a direct employment case against Intrixo B.V. The official announcement of the judgment indicates that it concerned a Turkish worker holding kennismigrant status, for whom a minimum salary threshold of €3,909 applied. The public description of the case in AR Updates identifies it directly as “werknemer/Intrixo B.V.”

According to the public summary by the law firm Taylor Wessing, Intrixo paid the worker too low a salary, as a result of which the IND withdrew his residence permit. The employer then attempted to rely on that as the basis for terminating the employment, but the court held this to be improper and awarded the worker a fixed damages amount corresponding to the remaining term of the contract. In addition, public search results concerning this case also indicate a reference to “schending waarheidsplicht.”

### What this practically means for Intrixo

This is not an ordinary dispute about wages or overtime. It is a case combining labour law, kennismigrant remuneration, immigration consequences, and a public signal concerning a possible breach of the duty to tell the procedural truth.

### 3) T&S Flexwerk / T&S Flex Logistiek B.V. — an indirect trace, not a direct one

#### Rechtbank Rotterdam — 28 April 2023  
**ECLI:NL:RBROT:2023:5934**

#### Gerechtshof Den Haag — 1 April 2025  
**ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2025:577**

Here, full precision is required. In the publicly published employment/accident case, the worker was employed by T&S Flex Logistiek B.V. and worked as an agency worker on a production line at Sanders. She then tripped over a pallet, suffered a fractured elbow, received sickness benefits, and pursued liability for the damage.

Formally, however, the defendants were Koninklijke Sanders B.V. and its insurer Allianz, not T&S itself. The appellate court upheld the judgment dismissing the claims, finding that the user of labour had shown compliance with its duty of care. The official judgment and public summaries clearly show that T&S appears here as the formal employer or agency, but not as the directly sued party that lost the proceedings.

### What this practically means for T&S

There is a public trace of an employment-related case connected with T&S, but there is no basis for honestly claiming that it was a direct lawsuit against T&S Flex Logistiek B.V. itself. That distinction matters.

### 4) NWH Jobs B.V.

In the reviewed public judgment databases, no published labour judgment directly against NWH Jobs B.V. was confirmed. Public administrative and housing-related documents concerning this company were found, but no published labour judgment that can safely and unambiguously be attributed to that entity.

### 5) Efficient at Work / Efficiënt@work B.V.

In the reviewed public judgment databases, no published labour judgment directly against Efficiënt@work B.V. was confirmed. Public press and parliamentary materials concerning allegations related to the treatment of workers and housing were found, but these are not classified here as publicly published labour court disputes.

### 6) Masterteam B.V.

In the reviewed public judgment databases, no published labour judgment directly against Masterteam B.V. was confirmed.

## Brief conclusion

The strongest court material currently concerns:
1. **Uitzendbureau Solutions** — by far the strongest; it is a multi-year package of labour disputes ending in the Hoge Raad.  
2. **Intrixo** — one, but very serious employment case involving a kennismigrant, underpayment, withdrawal of a residence permit, damages, and a mention of waarheidsplicht.  
3. **T&S Flexwerk / T&S Flex Logistiek** — only an indirect trace in a workplace accident case; the company appears as the formal employer, but not as the directly sued entity.

For NWH Jobs, Efficiënt@work, and Masterteam, this review did not confirm publicly published labour judgments directly against those companies.

## Note regarding the further part

---

# Network of links and potential red flags around Sezer Duygulu and related entities

## Scope, methodology, and limitations

This report was compiled solely from information available in public sources, such as government services, industry registers, court rulings, official publications, company websites, press and trade materials, and municipal documents. I did not use any paid databases, leaks, or invasive methods.

In practice, this also means significant limitations. Full, current KVK data, such as ownership structure, history of changes, or the list of officers, are usually available in the Netherlands only for a fee. Therefore, where the report refers to KVK data, it does so only where a company itself published a KVK extract in PDF form on its website. In all other cases, it states only what can be publicly confirmed, for example membership in industry registers, press communications, or municipal documents.

In the report, I use the term “red flag” in the sense of a signal of legal, reputational, or organizational risk, and not as automatic proof of guilt. When I describe sensitive issues such as the work–housing relationship, settlements, or disputes, I stick to what the sources actually show or communicate.

## Map of links and timeline of consolidation

Public industry sources show that in 2022 Solutions Group announced a change of umbrella name to Home of People as the umbrella company for several agencies and communicated a growth strategy and further acquisitions.

The consolidation threads visible in the sources can be summarized as follows:
- **2021** — information about the acquisition of T&S appears in an industry interview about the group,
- **November 2023** — the acquisition of NWH Jobs is communicated and expressly described as an acquisition,
- **June 2024** — the acquisition of Efficient at Work by Home of People is communicated, together with a declaration that it would continue to operate under its own brand,
- **September 2025** — the concentration relating to the acquisition of Intrixo is described in official publications connected with the ACM concentration procedure and in the Staatscourant; these materials also contain information that Intrixo holds a participation in Masterteam B.V. within the Intrixo group,
- **September 2025** — trade media describe the acquisition of Intrixo and Masterteam by Home of People.

The concentration documents also state that the acquiring entity, Home of People Acquisitie 3 B.V., is part of Home of People Groep, headed by D.G. Solutions B.V.

From a compliance perspective, this is an important context. A series of acquisitions and rapid group expansion increases organizational complexity and therefore potentially also the risk of errors in labour law, housing, settlements, and the handling of employee complaints, even if the declared aim is the professionalization of operations.

## Profiles of related entities

Below is a separate dossier for each indicated company or brand, as well as for additional entities that could be publicly linked to the activity on the basis of concentration documents or publicly available KVK extracts.

## Home of People

### Publicly published data and addresses

The group website contains a list of locations and the address of the main headquarters:
- Home of People (head office): Jogchem van der Houtweg 8c, 2678 AG De Lier,
- Solutions: Jogchem van der Houtweg 8c, 2678 AG De Lier,
- T&S Flexwerk: Industrieweg 30, 5145 PV Waalwijk,
- TENS Holanda: Paseo de la Esperanza 13, 28005 Madrid,
- NWH Jobs: Gieterij 35, 2211 WC Noordwijkerhout,
- Efficient at Work: Leehove 62, 2678 MC De Lier,
- Intrixo + Masterteam: Oud Camp 8, 3155 DL Maasland.

### Capital links

The official concentration publication in the Staatscourant states that Home of People Acquisitie 3 B.V. is part of Home of People Groep and that D.G. Solutions B.V. stands at the head of that group.

### Mentions and consolidation process

Industry sources describe the rebranding of Solutions Group into Home of People and the strategy of further acquisitions.

### Warning signals at group level

The key red flag at the model level is that many brands in the group communicate the provision of transport and housing to workers. For the temporary labour market, this is a common model, but at the same time a classic source of risk: worker dependence on the agency and housing, deductions, and pressure when work is lost. Such a mechanism is widely described as a systemic risk in documents concerning labour migration.

## Uitzendbureau Solutions

### Name, KVK, and locations

The website in Polish and English states:
- KVK: 27284993,
- registered seat: Jogchem van der Houtweg 8c, 2678 AG De Lier,
- additional location: Daltonstraat 9, 1704 SX Heerhugowaard.

The public NBBU membership card shows: Uitzendbureau Solutions B.V. — member since 01-07-2006, KVK 27284993.

### Management and owners

In publicly available materials, it was not possible to confirm the full current ownership structure and list of officers solely on the basis of open sources. **I DO NOT KNOW** who is formally the shareholder or management on the date of writing solely on the basis of public sources available without paid access to the KVK.

### Press mentions and strategic context

Within the industry and sector, Solutions is described as the core of the group that adopted the name Home of People and operates with the ambition of further consolidation.

### Court cases and disputes

The hardest legal thread concerns the case that reached the Hoge Raad and concerned the so-called agency clause in the context of the collective labour agreement for temporary work, and whether such a provision could lead to immediate termination of the employment relationship. The case also had an earlier stage at the Gerechtshof Den Haag.

This is not automatically proof of exploitation, but it is a red flag in the sense that:
- it concerns a contractual tool that in practice may increase employment insecurity,
- especially among migrant workers,
- and it was controversial enough to end with a ruling at the level of the Supreme Court.

### Housing and work–housing dependency

The housing theme returns in official and municipal documents concerning labour migration and market regulation. Municipal documents indicate that the dependence of a worker on the employer or intermediary may be multidimensional, for example when it simultaneously includes work, housing, and insurance, which raises the threshold for reporting abuse.

Additionally, in a publicly available administrative case, Solutions appears as a party or participant in the context of worker housing locations within a municipality. This does not in itself determine violations, but it shows a real connection between recruitment/employment activity and housing infrastructure, that is, an area of particular sensitivity.

## T&S Flexwerk / T&S Flex Logistiek B.V. and TENS Holanda

### Name, address, KVK

The T&S website states: Industrieweg 30, 5145 PV Waalwijk, KVK number 67521622, and also indicates the recruitment location TENS Holanda in Madrid at Paseo de la Esperanza 13, 28005 Madrid.

The public NBBU membership card shows: T & S Flex Logistiek B.V., KVK 67521622, member since 01-01-2022, address Industrieweg 30, 5145 PV Waalwijk.

### History and operating model

The history section on the T&S website explicitly states that from the beginning the company organized transport and housing for international workers and that in 2007 it opened a recruitment office in Madrid under the name TENS Holanda.

### Link with Home of People

T&S communicates that it has been part of Home of People since 2021.

### Court cases and disputes

There is a publicly available trace of a dispute concerning a workplace accident involving a worker employed as an agency worker by T&S Flex Logistiek B.V., examined by the appellate court in The Hague under ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2025:577. The description indicates that the court found no liability on the part of the employer or user of labour for the damage because the duty of care had been met.

This is not evidence of systemic abuse, but it is a signal that disputes in the area of workplace safety and civil liability appear within the company’s ecosystem, which remains an important area of risk in this sector.

### Warning signals

T&S strongly communicates housing and transport as elements of its offer. This is normal in market terms, but at the same time it increases the risk of worker dependence on the employing entity.

## NWH Jobs B.V.

### Address and activity

The company publishes a certified KVK extract in PDF form. It shows, among other things:
- name: NWH Jobs B.V.,
- address: Gieterij 35, 2211 WC Noordwijkerhout,
- business profile: the provision of personnel, in particular for the agricultural sector, and secondment.

### Owner and management — change in 2023

The KVK extract published on the NWH website states that NWH Holding B.V. is the sole shareholder and that Sezer Duygulu is listed as bestuurder with an effective date of 01-11-2023.

This is one of the clearest, publicly verifiable personal and capital links.

### Industry membership

The public NBBU membership card shows: NWH Jobs B.V., KVK 28116166, member since 01-01-2025, address Gieterij 35, 2211 WC Noordwijkerhout.

### Compliance-related declarations

On its Certifications page, NWH communicates that it holds a verklaring van goed betaalgedrag from the Belastingdienst and uses a G-account as a mechanism to limit the risk of non-payment of taxes and contributions. This is a company declaration, but it is publicly available.

### Warning signals

The key observation is that the ownership change and entry into the group in 2023, together with the rapid sequence of further acquisitions within the group in 2024–2025, may indicate fast process and integration changes. This is a typical source of operational risk in the sector.

## Efficient at Work / Efficiënt@work B.V.

### Addresses and KVK

On its job-offer site in Polish, Efficient at Work publicly states:
- KVK number: 50097784,
- registered seat in the Netherlands: Leehove 62, 2678 MC De Lier,
- branch in Poland: Piłsudskiego 124 A, 26-200 Końskie, Poland.

### Link with Home of People

Industry sources show that Home of People communicated the acquisition of Efficient at Work in June 2024, while keeping the brand and operational independence. This move was also described by a law firm in a public transactional advisory news item.

### Operating model

The company website advertises comfortable housing and free transport as part of the offer. For risk assessment, it is important that municipal documents treat such a bundling of services as a sensitive area.

## Intrixo

### Address and registry data

Intrixo publishes a KVK extract in PDF form. The document shows, among other things:
- Intrixo B.V., registered seat or branch: Oud Camp 8, 3155 DL Maasland,
- legal form: B.V.,
- principal activity: temporary labour / employment agencies,
- sole shareholder: TAF Group C.V. since 12-05-2020,
- management: Rayif Ayyildiz, indicated as general director, since 2001.

### Link with Masterteam and acquisition by Home of People

The official concentration publication states that Intrixo holds a participation in Masterteam B.V. Trade communications described the acquisition of Intrixo and Masterteam by Home of People.

### SNF — public proof of registration

Intrixo publishes an SNF registration certificate showing that the entity is included in the register for the standardization of migrant housing, together with the registration date.

### Housing as a high-risk area

A municipal programme concerning labour migration contains a passage about large housing locations for EU workers. It explicitly states that the Mixxinn location at Zichtenburglaan, Vijverzicht, was previously owned by Haag Wonen and was purchased by Intrixo, formerly Voorne Putten, and is then used by Intrixo to house EU workers.

This is a very concrete piece of public documentary information showing a direct connection between the agency and a housing base. This, in turn, is one of the most sensitive areas in labour disputes, because it concerns not only work and wages, but also real housing dependence.

The same document also describes risks such as:
- rent per bed averaging 110–150 euros per week,
- overcrowding,
- high turnover,
- pressure on neighbourhoods,
- the worker’s multidimensional dependence where housing and insurance are arranged by the employer,
- phenomena of sham constructions,
- shifting tax benefits to the employer as a potential improper earning model.

## Masterteam

### Address and place within the group

The Home of People website lists Masterteam at the same address as Intrixo: Oud Camp 8, 3155 DL Maasland.

### Industry membership

The public NBBU membership card shows: Masterteam B.V., KVK 30110824, member since 01-04-2023.

### Link with Intrixo

The concentration document identifies Masterteam as a participation within the Intrixo group.

### Management and owners

No public KVK extract in PDF form published by Masterteam was found that would confirm management and shareholders. **I DO NOT KNOW** with full certainty who is the formal shareholder or management beyond what follows from concentration documents and group websites.

## Additional related entities disclosed in concentration documents

### Home of People Acquisitie 3 B.V.

In the concentration materials, this appears as the party to the concentration, i.e. the entity acquiring Intrixo. Without paid KVK access, it was not possible to confirm the full current management and ownership structure. **I DO NOT KNOW** this on the basis of public sources available without payment alone.

### D.G. Solutions B.V.

The concentration publication states that it stands at the head of Home of People Groep.

## Red flags and risks from the perspective of labour law, housing, and reputation

The main red flags, that is, the areas where further checking is worthwhile in due diligence, form several recurring patterns.

### 1. Work–housing–transport model

Very clearly visible is the model of combining work, housing, and transport as part of the offer. In practice, this is standard in the blue-collar and labour migration segment, but at the same time it is one of the biggest generators of risk: deductions, dependence, pressure in the event of conflict, and the risk of overcrowding.

### 2. Housing as a tool of dependence

The Intrixo thread shows that housing can be not only a service, but also an asset directly linked to the agency’s business model. This increases the gravity of a labour conflict, because it ceases to concern only wages or scheduling and begins to concern a roof over one’s head as well.

### 3. Court disputes of substantial weight

The Solutions thread concerned a contractual construction of very significant social importance, namely the use and validity of the agency clause in the collective labour agreement and its effects on continuity of employment. The mere fact that the case was examined by the Supreme Court constitutes a strong signal of contractual and systemic risk.

### 4. Consolidation and integration risks

Public sources show a series of acquisitions: NWH in 2023, Efficient in 2024, Intrixo and Masterteam in 2025. Every acquisition usually means a transition period in which differences in labour standards, payroll systems, settlements, housing, transport, and complaint procedures may create an elevated risk of incidents.

### 5. Reputational and regulatory risks

Municipal documents devote considerable attention to misstanden, pressure on neighbourhoods, the need for enforcement pressure, purchase protection, and the requirement of decent habitation. This is not an accusation against one company, but a regulatory context showing that the entire market segment is under growing supervisory and social pressure.

## Practical conclusions for due diligence

If the aim is to assess the risk of abuse against migrant workers, then on the basis of public sources the key issue is not a single phrase, but rather checking the mechanics of how the entities operate.

The highest priority should be given to verifying:
- the actual rules for deductions for rent, transport, and insurance and their compliance with the collective labour agreement,
- the separation of the employer/intermediary relationship from the landlord relationship,
- complaint procedures, languages of communication, and protection against retaliation,
- the history of ownership changes and whether contracts, housing standards, rates, and regulations changed together with the acquisitions.

From the perspective of red flags in public sources, the strongest elements are:
- the dispute over the agency clause at the level of the Supreme Court,
- the purchase and use of a housing facility by Intrixo described in municipal documents,
- the public NWH KVK extract showing the formal entry of Sezer Duygulu into management or an ownership change in 2023,
- the descriptions of the risk model in municipal documents concerning labour migration.

I would like to point out that, in the context of labour disputes, not all court cases involving disputes with employment agencies are publicly available. Only part of the judgments are published on Rechtspraak, and information about the date and location of a civil hearing often has to be obtained directly from the court.

---

The presented material indicates that Home of People is developing in a planned manner by acquiring successive agencies and integrating them into one shared operational structure. Such a model allows the group to increase the scale of its activities, strengthen its administrative capacity, plan personnel more effectively, and further expand its housing and transport system. As a result, Home of People gains a stronger market position and greater organisational capacity, and may also exert increasing pressure on traditional, independent Dutch agencies that do not have comparable housing, logistical, or administrative infrastructure.

It is also possible that, if one agency within the group fails to pass the Wtta system, the group may attempt to maintain its operations through another company holding its own toelating, by concluding new contracts with workers and keeping them with the same clients.

From the perspective of an ordinary worker, this means that in a dispute over their rights, they may no longer be facing a single agency, but rather a better organised group with greater operational resources, greater administrative cohesion, and a greater ability to influence the organisation of work, housing, and transport. In practice, this may make it more difficult to effectively enforce workers’ rights.

In my employment dispute against the agency, it is already possible to trace how such a mechanism operates in practice, on the basis of the evidence-based material presented below.

Taken as a whole, the evidence I provided shows that the version presented to SNCU by Sezer Duygulu does not reflect the actual course of events and omits a number of material facts confirmed by documents and system records. In my resignation letter of 9 July 2025, I stated clearly that I was terminating my employment contract with one month’s notice and that my final day of employment would be 10 August 2025. In the same letter, I requested a full final settlement of all amounts due, payment in lieu of unused vacation if it would not be possible to take that leave during the notice period, and, after the end of the employment, delivery of confirmation of the termination of the contract, the final settlement, payslips, and the jaaropgave. Then, on 3 August 2025, I informed Intrixo again that after checking the planning application I could see that not all points from my resignation had been correctly recorded or entered into the system. The attached correspondence also shows that on 24 July 2025 I asked the agency to allow me to use my vacation days as soon as possible until the last day of my employment, and on 25 July planner A. replied that I could use my vacation hours from the following week and that I had 61.11 vacation hours, which would be divided over two weeks. On 27 July, I confirmed that I would start my vacation on Tuesday, 29 July 2025, and continue it until the end of my employment. Despite this, on 28 July I. Ś. wrote that “unfortunately there is no such thing,” while at the same time confirming that my last working day would be 10 August in accordance with my resignation, and then, in a subsequent message, demanded that I report to work the next day, otherwise it would be treated as a failure to comply with the contract and the notice. On that same day, I again confirmed in writing that I was using my accrued vacation hours from 29 July 2025 until my final day of employment, in line with the earlier arrangement. In addition, the planning system showed “Vakantie” entries for Tisento Plants in De Lier at Veilingweg 2, in week 31 for 29 July 2025 from 07:00 to 17:00 and in week 32 for 4 August 2025 from 07:00 to 17:00, which is plainly inconsistent with the later narrative that 28 July was my actual last day of work and that after that date I simply never returned. The payslip for week 32, covering the period from 4 to 10 August 2025, also confirms that during that time I still appeared as an employee on an indefinite contract with a guaranteed 32-hour workweek, and that the calculation for that week was based on the item “Vakantiedagen” in the amount of EUR 492.24, with total gross pay of EUR 492.73, net pay of EUR 450.24, a deduction of EUR 144.00 for ET-uitruil housing, EUR 39.96 for Zorg en Zekerheid, and a net payment of EUR 266.28, while the vacation balance was simultaneously reduced to zero through an opname of 34:11 hours. Meanwhile, the correspondence provided through Het Juridisch Loket shows that SNCU only initiated a preliminary procedure, obtained consent to contact the employer, and then closed the case after receiving the employer’s response without taking any further action. The SNCU inspector himself stated that the matter concerned an employee with a phase C contract for 32 hours per week who claimed that, when no work was available, he was regularly forced to use vacation time instead of receiving the wages guaranteed under his contract, but considered the factual assessment difficult because in weeks 31 and 32 I allegedly might have requested or taken vacation on my own initiative. Sezer Duygulu then, replying from a Home of People email address and signing as Founder Home of People, presented SNCU with the version that I was still working in week 31 on Monday, 28 July 2025, that this was also my last day of work, that I informed the company I had found another job and then never returned, that in week 29 I worked more than 41 hours, in week 30 only 2.5 hours, and in week 31 one more day, after which — based on an average over four weeks — I had been paid correctly and therefore nothing further needed to be done. That version of events is, however, in direct and serious contradiction with my resignation, the later correspondence, the confirmations concerning vacation, the “Vakantie” entries in the planning system, and the payslip for week 32. This leads to the conclusion that SNCU closed the case despite the existence of serious, documented, and unresolved contradictions, and that the employer’s version was treated as sufficient despite the evidentiary record indicating a different course of events.

### Additional evidence obtained from camera recordings

The new evidence in the form of camera recordings additionally and unequivocally undermines the credibility of the version presented to SNCU by Sezer Duygulu, also in connection with the content of the entry. In the message submitted to SNCU, he stated: “You worked in week 31, on Monday 28 July 2025; this was also your last day of work. On that day, you informed us, which was also recorded, that you had found another job, after which you did not return. Afterwards, we received no further messages from you.”

However, this statement is contradicted by the new evidence. The recordings from the camera installed by me in the agency hotel Mixx Inn, in the room where I was accommodated by Intrixo, show my presence there also after 28 July 2025, in particular on 2 August 2025 and 8 August 2025.

## Source links

https://www.flexnieuws.nl/2022/12/solutions-group-lanceert-nieuwe-naam-home-of-people/
https://www.bpnieuws.nl/article/9487775/solutions-group-lanceert-nieuwe-naam-home-of-people/
https://www.groentennieuws.nl/article/9486553/solutions-group-lanceert-nieuwe-naam-home-of-people/
https://www.flexnieuws.nl/2023/07/
https://www.flexnieuws.nl/2024/06/home-of-people-neemt-ook-efficient-at-work-over/
https://www.lexence.com/en/article/lexence-advised-home-of-people-b-v-on-its-acquisition-of-efficientwork-b-v/
https://www.flexnieuws.nl/2025/09/20/intrixo-en-masterteam-in-westland-handen-van-home-of-people/
https://www.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stcrt-2025-32307.html
https://www.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stcrt-2025-33709.html
https://www.acm.nl/nl/publicaties/home-people-wil-intrixo-overnemen-concentratiemelding
https://denhaag.raadsinformatie.nl/document/13336028/1/RIS316674_Bijlage_-_Programma_Arbeidsmigrantie_in_goede_banen
https://intrixo.nl/app/uploads/2023/10/KvK-Uitreksel-Intrixo-B.V.-23-10-2023.pdf
https://intrixo.nl/app/uploads/2022/12/SNF_VerklaringVanRegistratie-07-12-2022-Intrixo-BV.pdf
https://intrixo.nl/voor-opdrachtgevers/
https://www.normeringflexwonen.nl/register
https://www.normeringflexwonen.nl/informacje-dla-mieszkancow
https://nwhjobs.nl/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/1.1a-Uittreksel-KvK-NWH-gewaarmerkt.pdf
https://nwhjobs.nl/certificeringen/
https://www.solutionsteam.nl/pl/o-firmie-solutions/
https://www.solutionsteam.nl/pl/klienci/
https://www.tensflexwerk.nl/over-tensflexwerk/
https://www.tensflexwerk.nl/team/sezer-duygulu/
https://www.homeofpeople.nl/contact/
https://www.efficientatwork.nl/pl/oferty-pracy-w-holandii/
https://www.nbbu.nl/nl/onze-leden/uitzendbureau-solutions-bv
https://www.nbbu.nl/nl/onze-leden/t-s-flex-logistiek-bv
https://www.nbbu.nl/nl/onze-leden/nwh-jobs-bv
https://www.nbbu.nl/nl/onze-leden/efficientwork-bv
https://www.nbbu.nl/nl/onze-leden/intrixo-bv
https://www.nbbu.nl/nl/onze-leden/masterteam-bv
https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI%3ANL%3AHR%3A2023%3A426
https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI%3ANL%3AGHDHA%3A2021%3A2886
https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI%3ANL%3APHR%3A2022%3A846
https://semantius.nl/uitspraken/ECLI%3ANL%3AGHDHA%3A2025%3A577
https://www.homeofpeople.nl/over-ons/
https://www.homeofpeople.nl/contact/
https://www.homeofpeople.nl/app/uploads/2022/11/PERSBERICHT-Solutions-Group-lanceert-Home-of-People-web.pdf
https://www.homeofpeople.nl/app/uploads/2023/11/PERSBERICHT-Home-of-People-overname-NWH-Jobs.pdf
https://www.homeofpeople.nl/app/uploads/2024/06/PERSBERICHT-Home-of-People-overname-Efficient-at-Work.pdf
https://www.homeofpeople.nl/nieuws/home-of-people-groeit-uit-tot-marktleider-in-regio-westland/
https://www.homeofpeople.nl/blogs/bouwen-aan-groei-in-het-westland-buy-build/
https://www.solutionsteam.nl/pl/
https://www.solutionsteam.nl/pl/klienci/
https://www.solutionsteam.nl/app/uploads/2023/03/UZB-SNA_VerklaringVanRegistratie.pdf
https://www.solutionsteam.nl/app/uploads/2023/03/UZB-SNF_VerklaringVanRegistratie.pdf
https://www.tensflexwerk.nl/pl/o-tensflexwerk/
https://www.tensflexwerk.nl/app/uploads/sites/4/2023/06/SNA_VerklaringVanRegistratie.pdf
https://www.tensflexwerk.nl/app/uploads/sites/4/2023/06/SNF_VerklaringVanRegistratie.pdf
https://www.homeofpeople.nl/app/uploads/2024/09/Persbericht-opening-Valkenvoort-TS-Flexwerk.pdf
https://nwhjobs.nl/pl/kontakt/
https://nwhjobs.nl/pl/oferty-pracy/
https://nwhjobs.nl/pl/nwh-jobs-dolacza-do-grupy-rekrutacyjnej-home-of-people/
https://nwhjobs.nl/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Aviapartner-Platform-employee-PL.pdf
https://intrixo.nl/
https://intrixo.nl/app/uploads/2022/05/KvK-aangepast-VPU-naar-Intrixo-per-01-05-2022.pdf
https://www.acm.nl/nl/publicaties/home-people-wil-intrixo-overnemen-concentratiemelding
https://www.pellicaan.nl/en/news/pellicaan-advocaten-advised-home-of-people-on-the-acquisition-of-intrixo-bv-and-masterteam
https://www.nbbu.nl/nl/onze-leden/uitzendbureau-solutions-bv
https://www.nbbu.nl/nl/onze-leden/t-s-flex-logistiek-bv
https://www.nbbu.nl/nl/onze-leden/nwh-jobs-bv
https://www.nbbu.nl/nl/onze-leden/efficientwork-bv
https://www.nbbu.nl/nl/onze-leden/intrixo-bv
https://www.nbbu.nl/nl/onze-leden/masterteam-bv
https://www.normeringarbeid.nl/snakeurmerk/gecertificeerde-ondernemingen/export
https://www.normeringflexwonen.nl/snfkeurmerk/gecertificeerde-ondernemingen/export
https://www.flexmarkt.nl/algemeen/aantrekkelijk-werkgeverschap-bij-home-of-people-een-huis-maar-vooral-een-thuis/
https://www.flexnieuws.nl/2024/06/home-of-people-neemt-ook-efficient-at-work-over/
https://www.flexnieuws.nl/2025/10/home-of-people-breidt-verder-uit-met-intrixo-en-masterteam/
https://www.groentennieuws.nl/article/9573652/uitzendbureau-nwh-jobs-toegevoegd-aan-groep-home-of-people/
https://www.groentennieuws.nl/article/9774930/home-of-people-breidt-uit-in-regio-westland-met-overname-intrixo-en-masterteam/
https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:HR:2023:426
https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2020:460
https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2020:706
https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2025:14

## Further findings and updates

This section will be supplemented with further publicly available information, source materials, and documented circumstances relevant to assessing credibility, links, and the context of the entire case.
