[English version]

PUBLIC EVIDENCE REPORT – FULLY ANONYMIZED VERSION

Case: employment dispute connected with Intrixo B.V. / Voorneputten in the Netherlands
Scope: wages, guaranteed hours, deductions, accommodation, legal assistance and institutional responses
Authors: Worker 1 and Worker 2 – private data removed
Nature: informational and evidentiary document, not a judgment or legal advice
Report version: 2.0
Page last modified: 2026-10-04
Sources last verified: 11 July 2026
Publication status: public, anonymized full-report version.

0. Reservations

The report describes facts, documents and the authors' assessments based on material in their possession.

Statements about possible violations are allegations requiring verification. They do not determine criminal, civil or professional liability.

The public version removes private-person data, exact accommodation and workplace locations, room and account numbers, document identifiers, signatures and unredacted recordings.

1. Case summary

• an open-ended NBBU Fase 4 agreement, equivalent to ABU Phase C, providing for 32 hours per week,
• periods without assigned work and a dispute about pay while available for work,
• accumulating costs and deductions during periods without work,
• missing or incomplete payroll documents and corrections,
• difficulty obtaining full performance of the court-recorded arrangements,
• problems involving successive representatives and institutional responses.

1A. Current amounts in successive calculations

The documentation contains three successive calculation versions prepared in 2026:

These figures are successive working calculations, not a final amount established by a binding decision. The material differences between them require comparison with the complete source documentation.

1B. Brief status of the main issues

The table below describes the earlier position on 14 July 2026 and concerns Worker 1. Later information, including publication of the decision and the appeal note, appears in separate sections. The page-edit date is not the date on which the current procedural position was established.

1C. Disciplinary decision of 29 June 2026

The decision of the Raad van Discipline in the ressort Den Haag dated 29 June 2026, reference 25-714/DH/DH, ECLI ECLI:NL:TADRSGR:2026:166, was officially published on 31 July 2026 at Tuchtrecht. According to the published decision, the objection was upheld, complaint parts a) and d) were upheld, parts b) and c) were dismissed, and a reprimand was imposed on the lawyer.

The official publication is anonymized and publicly available; the authors' own source copy remains private. Availability of this decision does not by itself establish the outcome of any later appeal to the Hof van Discipline or finality.

Appeal information — 3 October 2026: According to the authors, the first representative lodged an appeal with the Hof van Discipline. The current outcome of the appeal has not been independently confirmed. Publication of the decision does not itself establish that it is final.

1D. Public document and privately held materials

Private materials may be provided to competent institutions, courts, disciplinary bodies or verified legal representatives only through a justified and secure process.

2. Proces-verbaal of 12 March 2024

The document provided for a EUR 5,000 advance payment on wage arrears.

It also imposed a specific obligation on Intrixo: within two weeks it had to provide the worker's representative with:

“een berekening van het sinds 6 mei 2022 verschuldigde bruto loon”.

This was a calculation of gross wages due since 6 May 2022, not a general assignment to both parties.

3. Evidence material

• the proces-verbaal and correspondence concerning its retrieval and performance,
• the employment agreement and Fase 4 documents,
• payslips, hour schedules and corrections,
• lists of missing weeks and periods showing zero hours,
• bank-transfer evidence and comparison with net amounts,
• deduction schedules including accommodation and insurance,
• correspondence with the agency, lawyers and institutions,
• descriptions of audio and video evidence shared only through secure channels.

4A. Obligation recorded in the proces-verbaal

The obligation recorded in the proces-verbaal was for Intrixo to provide, within two weeks, a calculation of the gross wages due since 6 May 2022.

The proces-verbaal does not expressly state that a single document also had to contain:

• a complete gross-to-net reconciliation,
• every deduction,
• every bank transfer,
• separate treatment of the EUR 5,000 advance,
• the final balance.

4B. Data needed to verify the final balance

To independently test the conclusion that no further amount was due, the following additional data are needed:

• the full amount of gross wages due since 6 May 2022,
• hours due and hours recorded week by week,
• missing weeks and payslips,
• hourly rate, allowances, leave, public holidays and reserves,
• retrospective corrections,
• the gross-to-net calculation,
• all deductions and their basis,
• matching every bank transfer to a payroll period,
• separate treatment of the EUR 5,000 advance,
• the final balance.

This broader material is necessary to verify the final balance and a no-further-claim conclusion, but it should not be described as the literal content of one document expressly ordered by the proces-verbaal.

5. Findings concerning hours and wages

• the documents indicate a discrepancy between the 32-hour agreement and parts of the payroll data,
• some weeks lack a complete settlement or an available payslip,
• different spreadsheets produced materially different results,
• calculations limited to hours alone do not explain all gross components and deductions,
• without complete bank matching the final net balance cannot be reliably determined.

6. Deductions and accommodation

• the documentation contains deductions for accommodation, insurance, pension and other items,
• in some low-hour weeks deductions materially reduced the payment,
• each item requires a legal basis, period and calculation method,
• the report does not automatically declare every item unlawful, but identifies the need for review.

7. Correspondence and representatives

• the first representative attended the hearing, but a problem later arose with transfer of the complete file,
• the next representative did not achieve a clear conclusion and complete settlement,
• the third representative produced changing calculations; the available documentation does not contain a complete gross-wage calculation from 6 May 2022, and the no-further-claim conclusion was not supported by a separate, transparent final-balance reconciliation,
• professional responsibility must be assessed by the competent bodies or a court.

8. Accommodation, privacy and recordings of conversations at the agency

• the authors hold recordings concerning third-party entry into an occupied room,
• the authors also hold recordings of conversations conducted at the employment agency's office, including conversations with a person in a management role / a representative of the agency's management,
• the recordings concern, among other things, working conditions, settlements, the workers' situation and positions presented by the agency,
• the public version does not disclose the exact accommodation location, faces, voices or private-person data,
• the full recordings remain private material and may be provided securely to competent institutions, law-enforcement authorities in the Netherlands, courts or legal representatives,
• the recordings should be assessed in full and in the context of the remaining documents; the public report does not by itself determine any person's responsibility on the basis of those recordings.

9. Institutional route

• worker-support and legal-assistance bodies were contacted,
• letters were sent to sectoral, supervisory and disciplinary bodies,
• the matter was also presented to Polish and EU institutions,
• the publication concerns both the original dispute and the effectiveness of protection.

10. Conclusions

• the obligation recorded in the proces-verbaal concerned a calculation of gross wages due since 6 May 2022,
• the proces-verbaal should not be described as expressly requiring one document containing a complete gross-to-net reconciliation, every deduction and every bank transfer,
• gross-to-net data, deductions, transfers, the EUR 5,000 advance and the final balance are nevertheless necessary to independently test the conclusion that no further claim exists,
• missing documents, divergent spreadsheets and unmatched payments prevent a simple closure of the case,
• an independent specialist should assess the material with access to the complete evidence.

11. Safe evidence index

• D-01 – proces-verbaal and court documents,
• D-02 – agreement and employment records,
• D-03 – payroll and hour records,
• D-04 – deduction and correction schedules,
• D-05 – banking evidence,
• D-06 – correspondence with the agency and representatives,
• D-07 – correspondence with institutions,
• D-08 – safe descriptions of audio and video material.