For media and institutions

This page provides a clear public briefing for editorial teams, organizations and institutions. The wording remains legally cautious and anonymization safeguards are maintained.

One-page editorial briefing

Information in this report as of 3 October 2026

Two people describe disputes with Intrixo about working hours, wages and settlement after employment. Each case has its own documents, chronology and questions requiring clarification.

Worker 1

A dispute over the obligation to calculate gross wages from 6 May 2022, guaranteed hours, and reconciliation of payments and deductions.

Status described in the report: The report provides no independently confirmed final balance. The disciplinary decision of 29 June 2026 was published on 31 July 2026. According to the authors, an appeal was lodged; its outcome and finality remain unconfirmed.

Questions to resolve: Was the complete gross-wage calculation from 6 May 2022 provided? How were payments and deductions allocated, and how was the advance accounted for separately?

Worker 2

A separate dispute over scheduling under a 32-hour guarantee, negative balances and deductions, 61.11 hours of leave, and the final settlement.

Status described in the report: The public timeline describes SNCU closing the report on 20 January 2026 and Juridisch Loket recommending a lawyer on 14 February 2026. These events do not settle the pay dispute; no later final outcome has been confirmed here.

Questions to resolve: How were guaranteed hours, corrections, leave and the final balance calculated? What justified the deductions and SNCU closing the report?

Official anonymized decision — ECLI:NL:TADRSGR:2026:166

Summary and status · Evidence index

This summary uses published descriptions. Its preparation date does not represent a fresh review of private records. The general source-verification date remains 11 July 2026; later information carries its own dates and attribution.

This report presents documents, positions and questions for review. It does not establish a final balance or liability. Private records are shared individually through a previously agreed contact channel.

https://damian545-dj.github.io/raport-publiczny/en/media.html

Publicly available

anonymized summaries and timeline,
public evidence index references,
source links to Markdown documentation.

Media and institutional contact path

Contact: to preserve anonymity, we do not publish private individuals' contact details. Access to materials can be arranged with the author through a previously agreed private channel.

Role of GitHub Issues/Discussions

GitHub Issues/Discussions are for technical corrections and repository feedback only.
They are not the primary channel for journalists or institutions.
For media or institutional contact, use a private channel agreed with the author; do not post personal data or case documents in public issues.
Older test Issues are not media contact channels.

Legal and privacy limits

no publication of sensitive personal data,
material-sharing scope depends on purpose and data-protection compliance,
the report presents allegations/claims with documentation and is not a final legal determination.

How to request materials

If you already have an agreed private contact channel with the author, use it to provide your newsroom or institution, the purpose of your request, the case (Worker 1 or Worker 2) and the records sought. After verifying the contact, the author may share appropriately redacted extracts or copies of correspondence, pay records and procedural documents where data protection permits. The scope and a secure private delivery method, such as a restricted-access link, are agreed individually.

Supporting documents for media

Update history · Source file | Discussion guidelines · Source file

About the report · Source file

EN start · Key findings · Timeline · Evidence