Public evidence report · employment dispute · Netherlands

Employment case connected with Intrixo B.V.

The report describes a case concerning an NBBU Phase 4 agreement for 32 hours per week, wages, deductions and performance of the Rechtbank Den Haag process-verbaal of 12 March 2024. It organizes documents, calculations, correspondence and institutional responses.

Public anonymized versionUpdated: 15 July 2026

Five key facts

Each point leads to a safe public description of the underlying material.

document12 Mar 2024

The process-verbaal set out the duty to provide a gross-wage calculation. Review

document32 hours

An indefinite NBBU Phase 4 agreement, not an on-call contract. Review

calculationEUR 5,000

Advance paid on 18 March 2024; separate from the gross-wage calculation.

verification26 Mar 2024

Expiry of the two-week period stated in the process-verbaal. Timeline

not public29 Jun 2026

Disciplinary decision held privately; an anonymized description is public.

Key events

A concise route from the start of the calculation period to the report update.

Full timeline →
Period begins

Starting date of the required gross-wage calculation.

32-hour contract

NBBU Phase 4 agreement begins.

Process-verbaal

Calculation duty and advance.

Payment and deadline

EUR 5,000 transfer and expiry of two weeks.

Three calculations

The result changed after errors were raised.

Disciplinary decision

Part of the complaint upheld according to the held decision.

Changing calculation results

Successive working results, not a final amount established by a binding decision.

calculationapprox. EUR 3,503.05

First version with an incomplete document set.

calculationapprox. EUR 4,155.85

Second version; documentation still incomplete.

verificationEUR 7,741.03

Later version; not a complete final balance.

The report’s central question

Can the complete document set demonstrate that gross wages due from 6 May 2022, deductions, bank payments and the final balance were correctly calculated? The report presents material for independent verification and does not replace a decision by a competent authority.